AAC Vs AAC?
AAC Vs AAC?
As online sound broadcaster I had to personally put to the test the differences between AAC and AAC.
First know that AAC and AAC is the replacement for MP3. AAC is designed for highbitrate applications ex. 128 Kbps or better and AAC for lowerbitrate applications 96 Kbps or lower. Please note that I have based these numbers on the following:
1. Many encoders for AAC will provide bitrate options from 16Kbps 320Kbps
2. Many encoders fro AAC will provide bitrate options from 16Kbps 96Kbps
My concern for testing both versions of the AAC format came when we decided to broadcast in true CD quality onine at www.BeHeardRadio.com. We knew that to a complish CD quality using MP3 we will need to use 192Kbps a starting point being 256Kbps the right bitrate to give use the quality we where persuing. AAC allows us to have CD quality at a lower bitrate. The question that came to mind was which of the 2 formats AAC and AAC could deliver CD quality at the lower bitrate?
While testing the different bitrates a little surprise came to light! Please note that the codec we use to test our audio files is from MainConcept
16Kbps = AAC Peforms better than AAC
24Kbps= AAC Peforms better than AAC
32Kbps= AAC Peforms better than AAC
48Kbps= AAC Peforms better than AAC
56Kbps= AAC Peforms better than AAC
64Kbps= AAC same or better than AAC
80Kbps= AAC Peforms better than AAC
96Kbps= AAC Peforms better than AAC
128Kbps= AAC Peforms better than AAC
You can see that AAC performs better than AAC if you use
AAC vs AAC?
by admin on Apr.14 2009 under Articles
Hello friends at BeHeardRadio.com!
As online sound broadcaster I had to personally put to the test the differences between AAC and AAC.
First know that AAC and AAC is the replacement for MP3. AAC is designed for highbitrate applications ex. 128 Kbps or better and AAC for lowerbitrate applications 96 Kbps or lower. Please note that I have based these numbers on the following:
1. Many encoders for AAC will provide bitrate options from 16Kbps 320Kbps
2. Many encoders fro AAC will provide bitrate options from 16Kbps 96Kbps
My concern for testing both versions of the AAC format came when we decided to broadcast in true CD quality onine at www.BeHeardRadio.com. We knew that to a complish CD quality using MP3 we will need to use 192Kbps a starting point being 256Kbps the right bitrate to give use the quality we where persuing. AAC allows us to have CD quality at a lower bitrate. The question that came to mind was which of the 2 formats AAC and AAC could deliver CD quality at the lower bitrate?
While testing the different bitrates a little surprise came to light! Please note that the codec we use to test our audio files is from MainConcept
16Kbps = AAC Peforms better than AAC
24Kbps= AAC Peforms better than AAC
32Kbps= AAC Peforms better than AAC
48Kbps= AAC Peforms better than AAC
56Kbps= AAC Peforms better than AAC
64Kbps= AAC same or better than AAC
80Kbps= AAC Peforms better than AAC
96Kbps= AAC Peforms better than AAC
128Kbps= AAC Peforms better than AAC
You can see that AAC performs better than AAC if you use a bitrate higher than 64 Kbps. At 64Kbps quality is nearCD but not CD quality! it is clear that AAC is great for limited bitrate are great quality compare to any other format. In other words 48Kbps AAC is equal to 80 Kbps MP3.
It was clear to us that the right bitrate to truly achieve CD quality is 128Kbps AAC. This bitrate compares to MP3 at 192Kbps or better.
Conclusion: if you are planning to broadcast in CD quality either use AAC at 128Kbps or MP3 at 192Kbps or better! AAC is great for movies and nearCD quality at 48Kbps64Kbps using any bitrate higher than this and AAC will perfomr better and AAC.
About the writer:nbsp;nbsp;SirJ is the founder and program director at Be Heard Radio.SirJ is also a producer songwriter musician and singer.www.BeHeardRadio.comwww.SirJMusic.com
No related posts.
Posted in Web Development
